Literal Bastard

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

319 Good


About Literal Bastard

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender Male

Recent Profile Visitors

932 profile views
  1. Opt in to both
  2. If only I could grow a coca plant- I've yet to meet a person who hated the smell of it.
  3. Dreams about mulligans notwithstanding, I think this deck has potential. So far, I've only fooled about on devpro with it, and it seems explosive. However, I haven't played in a year, so I'm unsure as to what hand traps are real and what aren't. It's fairly run of the mill (if you can say that about a deck that's been hit this hard), but with the advent of cards such as Tenmataitei and Foolish burial goods, I believe that this direction solidifies the domain-centriic theme. Monsters (18): 3x Erebus 3x KURAISTO Kuraz 2x Tenmataitei 1x Ehther 3x Edea 3x Eidos 3x Mithra Spells (19): 3x Foolish Burial Goods 3x Tenacity 3x Domain 3x Return 1x March 1x Stormforth 1x Pantheism 1x Frost Blast 1x RotA 1x Foolish Burial 1x One For One Traps (3): 3x Prime Side Deck: 3x Jinzo 3x Flying "C" 2x Maxx "C" 3x System Down 2x Twin Twisters 2x Soul Exchange The goal here is the same as all of the Domain decks out there: Place Monarch on board with field spell and win game. That's oversimplifying it, but the deck's been around long enough that it should ingrained into each of your minds what it's supposed to do. The addition of FBG allows you to navigate more easily to it, doing half the work of either Ehther or Erebus. Yes, you can send Pantheism, which I do most of the time while going first. The great part about it is that it's banished, making any edea play that much more stable. If I'm going second and my opponent didn't ejaculate the contents of their main and extra into a gooey mess, and instead opened with real traps, sending frost blast clears out some problems. Of course, there's the problem of having a second monarch spell or trap to go along with it, but if the situation is dire enough, and you don't have tenacity, you can always pitch two with goods play domain twice. If I have a grave full of monarch spells, but lacking a suitable tribute, I can make like Megatron and send Prime to the grave. Now, Tenmataitei: this card is the stealthiest monarch around. I almost played a single of it and Angmarl, but Angmarl isn't always the best turn one play. Tenma sets things up for you and (if I read him correctly) tributed edea is protected by it's effect. Eidos, if normal summoned, then tributed, then activated in the graveyard (I believe) is protected. It's part of the reason I play March; a protected Tenma is a worthwhile investment, allowing you to play without the threat of hand traps being used as a response to your normal summons- it protects Return. With Tenma on the board, along with Return, I normal ehther or edea, I tribute for Ehther/Erebus/Kuraz, since SEGOC, I set up the chain to have Return as the chain link below a normal summoned monster, and voila, no Ghost Ash or Ogre can respond to it. The side is just a modified side from an italian regional, but it seems quite simple: Jinzo for Paleo, Maxx "C" for getting to either system down or Flying "C" for ABC and Zoo, respectively. Soul exchanges could probably become Gameciels, because Naturia Beast is being played (or so I gather?) in Zoo. Anyways, I want to get back in and this deck is a hell of a lot more cheap than anything else I see out there- and I'm not playing chain burn.
  4. Why haven't you maxed out on tombs and temples? If heretic is the nuts that you say it is, then the activation for tombs is a nonissue, and bribe seems like it's holding you back. Why pay for what you can get for free? vig=scum makes an interesting point about royal tribute. I think siding it out in favor of a solemn strike or chaos trap hole seems like a neat idea. For some cheap and esoteric ideas, I like the idea of wonder wand in the deck to supplement digging, but it's slow (a la reckless greed), although that 500 atk boost is nothing to scoff at.
  5. Same tbh Oh yeah, can a kaiju be summoned (by tributing the extra zoned monster) if all five main zones AND the extra zone are occupied?
  6. Aren't OTKs good for the game, though? Not FTKs, but OTKs. I'm not trolling, I'm just playing devil's advocate, for the love of christ, don't skewer me
  7. It's an odd source for ideas, but I dreamt of an option for a mulligan in yugioh. Basically, before their first turn, whoever was playing first drew an additional three cards, then took three cards from their hand and put them on the bottom in any order. I can see so much going wrong with this, but I like to entertain the idea. Thoughts?
  8. The only question I have is: Can D-Alc add cards banished with pot's eff back to hand? And to chime in, this card makes the game reliant on extra decks which is not at all a new thing.
  9. Not saying it's the best deck, but I would play some variant of piper. That being said, I haven't played in a long time.
  10. This seems tangentially appropriate.
  11. I think I'm t2/3 Oh well
  12. Panaderias are excellent Also, I'm super fucking hyped for a Protomen show this Saturday
  13. that's a Robert Frost poem
  14.   Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, And sorry I could not travel both And be one traveler, long I stood And looked down one as far as I could To where it bent in the undergrowth;   Then took the other, as just as fair, And having perhaps the better claim, Because it was grassy and wanted wear; Though as for that the passing there Had worn them really about the same,   And both that morning equally lay In leaves no step had trodden black. Oh, I kept the first for another day! Yet knowing how way leads on to way, I doubted if I should ever come back.   I shall be telling this with a sigh Somewhere ages and ages hence: Two roads diverged in a wood, and I— I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference.
  15. The side, right now, is: 3x Fire Hand 3x Ice Hand 3x Retaliating "C" 2x Cyber Dragon Core 3x Mistaken Arrest 1x Chimeratech Fortress Dragon And LaDD seems like it'd be bad to drop against BA, and making room for him seems unnecessary. If I lose the Monarchs, I lose my solutions to problem cards. The deck would be totally different if I ran it.