The Antagonist

In if this starts after next Wednesday, busy before then I can sub in if need be

Some thoughts from a guy who read 0 posts itt Getting "there's a third party" from literal standard role PMs is hilariously stupid. Every role PM should read like these ones unless your setup is open or you explicitly want to hand out more information about the setup (which is fine if that's what you're looking to do). Scum were slightly underpowered - it wouldn't have mattered this game because they went and got themselves killed but they did need a bit more of something Scum getting eliminated asap was about as poor of an outcome as possible for the balance of this game, it would have been much more interesting otherwise. That's unfortunate. I completely forgot about the existence of safeclaims LOL I have no idea why anyone would claim to be a neutral with a wincon which could clearly steal the win from town

ok boomer

flavour should be how jazz and scumwood's incessant arguing is UST (not in)

Aftergame thread:

quoted for emphasis

I can't remember everything but it had: -an insane cop that didn't know he was insane -one of the mechanics was "no lynch this day phase" -another was "whoever gets lynched gets to shoot someone" which punishes town for playing well (if scum get a gun then that's absurd) and rewards them for playing poorly -judas -a serial killer which was later changed to a neutral thunderdomer (massively swingy) - we eventually ended up with the lyncher role -a lynchproof mafia goon (until mylo, but...)

I still can't play so I can take a look I think we can all agree I do an excellent job of this

in terms of game balance - it was questionable but if you'd seen what I got sent initially then I think you would have no complaints

would be nice to tie that into sword and shield release in some way

not in bc I don't have time but if you want to shoot me the setup I can take a look

no

I didn't have time to follow this but someone give me a tl;dr

Qfe