Jump to content

Blex64

Duelist
  • Content count

    716
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

161 Solid

About Blex64

  • Rank
    Guardian
  1. Avengers: Age of Ultron

    Olsen is in talks for Scarlet Witch, but she's not confirmed. 
  2. Wii U

      I was hoping for a Link to the Past remake or something.  Wind Waker is still a good looking games and up on the times.  Seems like a quick cash in.   The rest of the news is pretty cool though.  Apparently fixing the shit load times this spring as well via updates.   The next 3DS Zelda is either Majora's Mask or Link to the Past. Link to the Past is likely also coming to the Wii U VC. 
  3. The Official 2012-2013 NFL Thread

    The Patriots offense hasn't preformed against the Ravens defense in their past several meetings. Honestly, I think they just get out-physicaled. The Pats run their gay dink-and-dunk Tom Lady bullshit, and the Ravens say "that's fine, you can catch your 6 or 8 yard pass, and I'm going to hit you for it." After they've taken a few shots they start to wear down. Welker's not a big guy, he can't take that kind of beating. 
  4. The Official 2012-2013 NFL Thread

    Yeah, fuck Pollard, trying to tackle and shit. he has blown out 3 different people's knees, i am pretty sure you can tackle without doing that   First off, the large majority of ACL tears (assuming you're referring to Brady) have nothing to do with being tackled. They're a result of improper stretching and conditioning.  He's "injured" 4 Patriots. Brady's ACL tear Welker's ACL tear Gronk in the last AFCC Ridley today   Welker didn't even make contact with Pollard. He made a cut to avoid him and tore his ACL on the cut, falling to the ground. Ridley lowered his helmet and ran headfirst into a stationary Pollard. He's a moron.  Edit: Want to call someone dirty? We can talk about Brady sliding with his leg up into Ed Reed. That will get you immediately ejected from a baseball or soccer game. 
  5. The Official 2012-2013 NFL Thread

    [quote name='Vyse the Legend' timestamp='1358375433' post='3372732'] [quote name='orangeeyes' timestamp='1358363573' post='3372542'] >fire coach because he couldn't win the big game >hire coach that couldn't win the big game [/quote] Andy was fired because he couldn't win period. The guy was given the ability to assemble whatever coaching staff he wanted and given final say over roster, but nothing meaningful came of it. I don't care who you are, if you stop winning you don't deserve to keep your job. In other news, I thought I was going to see Gus Bradley as our new coach when I woke up this morning. I really liked what he did in Seattle, and loved his demeanor. However, I was shocked to find Chip Kelly come to Philly after declaring he'd stay at Oregon last week. I think it's pretty exciting, but I honestly don't know how it's going to work. Vick won't be able to stay healthy if Kelly brings his offense to the NFL, and I doubt we'd keep him anyway. Foles doesn't work in that offense. If anything a trade or somebody from the draft will be the future of this team. [/quote] Andy Reid is far from a bad coach, sometimes you just need an environment change. People rarely hold the same job in non-football related shit for more than 3-5 years, and this is the same scenario I think. Reid should really be able to help KC. [quote name='Jesus the Jew' timestamp='1358377106' post='3372763'] [quote name='Blex64' timestamp='1358365341' post='3372563'] [quote name='orangeeyes' timestamp='1358365037' post='3372560'] I find it hard to believe Tebow won't make an NFL roster next season. As a QB that's a different story, but he seems like with a full offseason he'd be a good FB or maybe even a HB in some schemes. [/quote] Tebow's issue is that he hilariously insists on being a quarterback. Can't throw the ball accurately. Terrible mechanics. Refuses to play any other position. If he channeled his work ethic into another position, he has some potential, but he thinks God put him on this planet to be a QB. [/quote] Is that why he diligently played in the special teams for the Jets this season and went to every special teams practice with no public complaints? [/quote] I mean, he threw a fit when he wasn't named Sanchez's replacement. Its obvious he can't throw the ball to save his life. I doubt Rex wanted him to begin with, but neither does anyone else. The media circus is annoying and distracting, and the player is useless. Even the Jags don't want him.
  6. The Official 2012-2013 NFL Thread

    [quote name='orangeeyes' timestamp='1358365037' post='3372560'] I find it hard to believe Tebow won't make an NFL roster next season. As a QB that's a different story, but he seems like with a full offseason he'd be a good FB or maybe even a HB in some schemes. [/quote] Tebow's issue is that he hilariously insists on being a quarterback. Can't throw the ball accurately. Terrible mechanics. Refuses to play any other position. If he channeled his work ethic into another position, he has some potential, but he thinks God put him on this planet to be a QB.
  7. The Official 2012-2013 NFL Thread

    [quote name='beetle' timestamp='1358280982' post='3371592'] [quote name='Conspire' timestamp='1358280089' post='3371574'] While i wont pretend to know a lot about football i dont think its right to say the ravens got lucky because the broncos didnt play their best. Luck is when the ball takes a fortunate bounceo or the replacement ref throws his hat under your feet. Its not when the safety thinks "omg im gonna intercept the hell out of that and be a hero!" then misjudges the distance on the throw. I understand with 30 seconds left and that much field to go needing a td most teams wont come back and win. Then again most teams dont get 2 kick returns for tds either. Both happened because of mistakes from the opposing team. Peyton didnt play like an elite qb and the broncos d blew it in the clutch. The broncos making mistakes is not good luck for baltimore, its just poor decision making by denver. [/quote] Broncos safety tripped and fell over without being touched. Just happened to be with 30+ seconds left, behind a td, etc in a playoff game and a 70 yard pass. [/quote] LOL. He didn't trip, he played the ball wrong. He tried to undercut the route and play the ball instead of playing the receiver, and he gave up a touchdown because of it. He made a mistake and his team was punished for it. That's how football works at this level. These are the best teams in the league. This is the motherfucking playoffs. The team who shows up and makes the fewest mistakes loses. Denver made more mistakes. They misplayed Champ Bailey, Moore played that pass at the end of the game terribly, and their pass rush was completely neutralized. Their run game couldn't take over and Peyton threw 2 picks. The Ravens made huge mistakes on special teams, allowed 14 free points, pulled out a win, and people call them lucky because they need an excuse.
  8. The Official 2012-2013 NFL Thread

    [quote name='Lucky666' timestamp='1358262155' post='3371367'] I love how people say that the Ravens are lucky to still be in it, if the roles were reversed everyone would go on about how Denver is so good and there would be no mention of luck. Just keep hating fellas we thrive on it. [/quote] Tebow Tebows Steelers out of playoffs last year on some gay little 6 yard pass that DT wrecks with: TEBOW IS LITERALLY JESUS. Flacco throws gorgeous rainbow to tie game with 30 seconds left: LOL RAVENS ARE SO LUCKY. Yeah. Totally lucky they outplayed the Broncos and had fewer turnovers and all that.
  9. The Official 2012-2013 NFL Thread

    [quote name='The Rain Man' timestamp='1358208963' post='3370746'] [quote name='Blex64' timestamp='1358194099' post='3370417'] [quote name='gobstopper' timestamp='1358146460' post='3370039'] baltimores too old and run down, and flaccos too bad for the ravens to win imo. the only team left that can do it v them is the niners i think, and i dont wanna bet against brady and belichick when theyve seen the team earlier in the yr. brady and pats win 4th, brady is the g.o.a.t [/quote] You sound like ESPN writing about the Baltimore @ Denver game The Ravens just beat a better team. They beat the Pats earlier this year with a weaker team. Flacco played just as well as Brady did this weekend. He's certainly not the Achilles' heel. Baltimore's defense allowed fewer points to Denver than New England did to Houston. [/quote] Flacco really didnt play equal to Brady this weekend, he had an extra quarter and a half had less yards, worse completion percentage, and a worse qbr. [/quote] He had 13 fewer yards with 7 fewer completions. His completion% was worse because he throws the ball farther than 5 yards at a time. His YPA absolutely destroys Brady's. Both of their ratings are through the roof (like 120+) so i"m not going to even bother addressing that. They both played at the highest possible level. [quote name='gobstopper' timestamp='1358209659' post='3370769'] [quote name='Blex64' timestamp='1358194099' post='3370417'] [quote name='gobstopper' timestamp='1358146460' post='3370039'] baltimores too old and run down, and flaccos too bad for the ravens to win imo. the only team left that can do it v them is the niners i think, and i dont wanna bet against brady and belichick when theyve seen the team earlier in the yr. brady and pats win 4th, brady is the g.o.a.t [/quote] You sound like ESPN writing about the Baltimore @ Denver game The Ravens just beat a better team. They beat the Pats earlier this year with a weaker team. Flacco played just as well as Brady did this weekend. He's certainly not the Achilles' heel. Baltimore's defense allowed fewer points to Denver than New England did to Houston. [/quote] you shouldnt post about things you dont understand. [/quote] What a great refutation. Since you don't want to discuss football, can we get a detailed description of the flavor of Brady's cum? All you seem to be interested in is sucking his dick anyway.
  10. The Official 2012-2013 NFL Thread

    [quote name='gobstopper' timestamp='1358146460' post='3370039'] baltimores too old and run down, and flaccos too bad for the ravens to win imo. the only team left that can do it v them is the niners i think, and i dont wanna bet against brady and belichick when theyve seen the team earlier in the yr. brady and pats win 4th, brady is the g.o.a.t [/quote] You sound like ESPN writing about the Baltimore @ Denver game The Ravens just beat a better team. They beat the Pats earlier this year with a weaker team. Flacco played just as well as Brady did this weekend. He's certainly not the Achilles' heel. Baltimore's defense allowed fewer points to Denver than New England did to Houston.
  11. The Official 2012-2013 NFL Thread

    Rodgers played better than Brady and did more with less than Peyton. I think Luck should absolutely be ORotY actually. He did just as well as his buddies with no help. Washington and Seattle lead the league in percentage of plays that are designed rushes, and Seattle also has the league's top scoring defense. Luck had fuckall.
  12. Wii U

    [quote name='beetle' timestamp='1354652342' post='3339571'] Yes I played that part and I literally just scribbled my finger on the pad to do everything leading up to it. Is the entire game a side scrolling platform? So did they make two seperate 2d side scrollers for the launch of their home console in the end of 2012? Sigh, where art though smash bros? My issue is this, why spend $60 per game on side scrolling action? There are several itterations already on the Wii/Gameboy. Yes, you can beat them by pressing R + A, but I invision that gameplay like 10 years ago. Now it's just repackaged with somewhat flashier graphics. I just can't understand the logic behind releasing a high power console and porting a gameboy game on it on launch, let alone 2 similar games like that. [/quote] What the fuck are you talking about? Gameboy ports? The section I'm talking about involves physically rotating the gamepad. I don't think you beat it by scribbling on it.
  13. Wii U

    [quote name='beetle' timestamp='1354582510' post='3338851'] [quote name='Blex64' timestamp='1354573250' post='3338688'] [quote name='beetle' timestamp='1354560463' post='3338501'] [quote name='Indignation' timestamp='1354559698' post='3338487'] I liked ray man origins and it wasn't easy in my opinion. Its just the demo version anyway. They will probably add more demos soon since Xmas is coming. [/quote] I liked the Rayman games for the Wii, but this game feels like it was made for 10 and under. [/quote] What "Rayman Games for the Wii" are you talking about? Rayman Origins is the only Rayman game on the Wii, and its also on every other platform (literally all of them). The game was fantastic and Legends is the direct sequel of it, and the demo was actually pretty cool. The 2 demo levels I played (assuming they're the same) had one level completely synced up to [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R044sleOW6I"]Black Betty[/url], and another that you definitely cannot beat by doing what you described. You seem to be talking completely out of your ass. [quote name='Infinite' timestamp='1354571365' post='3338652'] So they only shipped > 50k to the UK? Then that's not terrible as I seemed to implied. In fact all I said was that it sold 40k with no knowledge of shipments. Sorry for comparison current console launches to past ones. Mah bad Also I'm not suggesting the Wiiu is shit because it only sold 40k in the UK. I'm more interested in them cleaning up the issues with the OS. [quote name='Recoome' timestamp='1354561576' post='3338522'] you're comparing a weeks values to the a 48 hour period. also i think it'll be similar to wii, in that rather than having a massive amount of sales early on, it'll consistently sell throughout it's life. i for one wasn't gonna shell out on this console until i could see the new gimmick first hand. i'm impressed, and will be a proud owner in a few weeks . also im not aware of anything businessy in the slightest, just my uneducated personal opinion. [/quote] They shipped over 40k and that just about sold out in 48 hours. As a result the numbers aren't going to get that much bigger. The comparison is fair. [/quote] If they sold the entire shipment and aren't going to be getting any more in that timeframe, is it really fair to compare performance? Sounds like their shipment was just too small (I know they had some manufacturing issues, don't know about the rest of it). [/quote] Raving Rabids and the 2nd one? They were both incredibly fun. Are you completely serious? There are at least 2 demo levels that you can literally complete by pressing Right, A, and swiping the game pad. Pleaseeeee don't talk shit if you're going to back it up like that. And my point is that Raving Rabids used the Wii gimmick so much better than Rayman for the Wii U at least from what I've played with in Demo. The game plays itself :/ [/quote] I forgot Raving Rabids existed, [s]are Rayman and co. even in them? [/s]Guess so. Still, kind of like comparing Mario Galaxy to Mario Kart. One of them you can absolutely complete "just by moving right and pressing A" (for the record, you can complete every 2D Mario level ever made by moving right and pressing A), the other one you can't unless you miss every single secret, which kind of destroys the point of a platformer to begin with. This is like saying you can beat every level of a shooter by running past the enemies to the checkpoints, and that the game "plays itself." I thought they demo'd a couple uses of the gamepad quite well. The part where you have to spin the maze for the guy navigating it was awesome. Did you even play that part? Or did you miss it with all your running right and pressing A?
  14. Wii U

    [quote name='beetle' timestamp='1354560463' post='3338501'] [quote name='Indignation' timestamp='1354559698' post='3338487'] I liked ray man origins and it wasn't easy in my opinion. Its just the demo version anyway. They will probably add more demos soon since Xmas is coming. [/quote] I liked the Rayman games for the Wii, but this game feels like it was made for 10 and under. [/quote] What "Rayman Games for the Wii" are you talking about? Rayman Origins is the only Rayman game on the Wii, and its also on every other platform (literally all of them). The game was fantastic and Legends is the direct sequel of it, and the demo was actually pretty cool. The 2 demo levels I played (assuming they're the same) had one level completely synced up to [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R044sleOW6I"]Black Betty[/url], and another that you definitely cannot beat by doing what you described. You seem to be talking completely out of your ass. [quote name='Infinite' timestamp='1354571365' post='3338652'] So they only shipped > 50k to the UK? Then that's not terrible as I seemed to implied. In fact all I said was that it sold 40k with no knowledge of shipments. Sorry for comparison current console launches to past ones. Mah bad Also I'm not suggesting the Wiiu is shit because it only sold 40k in the UK. I'm more interested in them cleaning up the issues with the OS. [quote name='Recoome' timestamp='1354561576' post='3338522'] you're comparing a weeks values to the a 48 hour period. also i think it'll be similar to wii, in that rather than having a massive amount of sales early on, it'll consistently sell throughout it's life. i for one wasn't gonna shell out on this console until i could see the new gimmick first hand. i'm impressed, and will be a proud owner in a few weeks . also im not aware of anything businessy in the slightest, just my uneducated personal opinion. [/quote] They shipped over 40k and that just about sold out in 48 hours. As a result the numbers aren't going to get that much bigger. The comparison is fair. [/quote] If they sold the entire shipment and aren't going to be getting any more in that timeframe, is it really fair to compare performance? Sounds like their shipment was just too small (I know they had some manufacturing issues, don't know about the rest of it).
  15. Wii U

    [quote name='Ultimate Buffalo' timestamp='1354243262' post='3336038'] but twilight was crap/average on Wii, it was decent on gamecube. but having a zelda or a PROPER mario game ( i dont count NSMBU as a core release, especially as its the same game as the last 3 iterations on 3 other consoles ) , If Smash Brothers was a launch title, the system would be sold out and be put on ebay for like a grand as people would go batshit crazy over the killer app, i mean really, what exactly else would people buy a wii u for apart from smash bros currently and at a stretch bayonetta 2 ? [/quote] Its the exact same game with completely different levels.
×