»ACP 33395 Posted May 4, 2016 Being able to play 3 Cyber Dragon, 3 of each gadget, 3 limiter removal seems pretty legit though. Cyber Dragon + Green Gadget + Limiter Removal is 7000 damage by itself. The fact that we have Ring of Destruction in the same format makes it even worse. The fact that gadgets can threaten lots of damage makes it so the opposing player actually has to use cards to stop the damage from getting through, but all of the gadgets are "free" in terms of cards anyways. It seems like a losing battle for the non-gadget player either way you look at it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
petqwe 286 Posted May 5, 2016 Banned: 第六感 = Sixth Sense Limited: マシュマロン = Marshmallon 現世と冥界の逆転 = Exchange of the spirit 死のデッキ破壊ウイルス = Crush Card Virus 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jazz 5020 Posted May 6, 2016 On 5/4/2016 at 11:28 AM, ACP said: Being able to play 3 Cyber Dragon, 3 of each gadget, 3 limiter removal seems pretty legit though. Cyber Dragon + Green Gadget + Limiter Removal is 7000 damage by itself. The fact that we have Ring of Destruction in the same format makes it even worse. The fact that gadgets can threaten lots of damage makes it so the opposing player actually has to use cards to stop the damage from getting through, but all of the gadgets are "free" in terms of cards anyways. It seems like a losing battle for the non-gadget player either way you look at it. I think you're ultimately correct, but it would be fun to explore the format regardless. There's a lot of power cards available that could potentially fuck with gadgets, and there might be a cool anti-gadget strategy hidden somewhere in there that's totally viable. I think the cutoff should be CRV quite frankly. Cydra is relevant in this meta, but probably Exarion is not. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites