Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/12/17 in all areas

  1. 6 points
    We played row B, meaning the only power role was town cop (Mascis) who scanned Jazz night 1 and nelrick night 2. Scum team was Wunter and Zero. QT link: https://www.quicktopic.com/52/H/7KKEie4qkjEw Scum MVP is Zero for successfully winning in lylo despite losing his partner day 1. Really didn’t think that’d pay off, but he proved me wrong. Please don’t let scum get away with this again. Huge thanks to Crei for helping me host; I was glad to have someone I could direct questions to. I hope you all thought I did alright despite having no prior experience. If you have any questions, comments, or concerns this is place to discuss them.
  2. 4 points
  3. 3 points
    im just glad this meme is still relevant
  4. 3 points
    i was away when this all happened but i just wanna say warring so far has been fun and it helped me top Nats so uno, keep it goin it's cool.
  5. 3 points
    Please stop being toxic, nelrick identifies as duckkin
  6. 3 points
    real talk you take neg rep way too seriously, it's not toxic to neg a post you disagree with you guys are also being assholes bitching about his no-neg rule. He's host, he can make w/e the fuck rules he wants within section rules. Either put up or shut up, don't join or deal with it.
  7. 3 points
    Disagree strongly with this, if you make a shit post you deserve to be negged for it, and if you care about your rep then grow the fuck up. (not in, I'm going on holiday soon)
  8. 3 points
  9. 3 points
    I just don't get dodging good players. It's like admitting you're terrible AND that you can't learn through failure. I mean, if you're sure you can't beat allen/perovic at goats, then why bother playing the format at all?
  10. 3 points
  11. 2 points
  12. 2 points
    A lynch on Mascis would've been nothing more than a long-term "policy" lynch or a "lynch all liars" to prevent it in the future, yea he was confirmed town despite faking a red check because the set-up is open and the last scum can't CC except in MYLO/LYLO I think temporarily faking red checks to see how people respond is fine (maybe they're scum and they will claim back? and now you caught scum), but I wouldn't have pushed it till Tyranno's death tbh, I can see how people see it as "game throwing" and how it's unwanted in the dgz meta. And it's not the first time Mascis fakeclaimed as town which cost the loss for town either, feel like you're trying to get too cute with those plays tbh but they aren't paying off at all (as compared to, say, claiming VT as PR to survive a nightkill, or claiming doc instead of BP in matrix6 in scenario's where it can't backfire. those are good examples of fake claiming as town in a way that it works). and if you claim doc early you're just baiting other PR's to claim Didn't read all but well played guys
  13. 2 points
    on dgz we lynch all liars and we discourage town reads feels good to be back
  14. 2 points
    People who are good at mafia dont put themselves in a position to claim PR on day 1
  15. 2 points
    Imo if you allow daytalk (like we always do) 12 hours should be sufficient, scum can just communicate during the day about their plans as well. I like 36 hours because 24 can feel a little rushed sometimes while 48h can have very silent days. 24h nights also means a really long time for non-scum people to just sit around doing nothing, while they're the majority of the players. I find 36/12 ideal but I don't mind other formats terribly
  16. 2 points
  17. 2 points
    There is literally not a single person telling him not to run the system he likes, including the people in the spectator chat right now.
  18. 2 points
    Fuck you guys for not letting jazz introduce the rep rule though, on his own game Hosting is a lot of time and effort and its not like hes asking for much in return. Hes just saying "can we try thus as an experiment cos it may make all of our experience better" Get off his duck etc (Saw i mistyped "dick" as "duck". Went to correct it then decided it was way better as duck)
  19. 2 points
    Seriously lol this site is toxic af and I'm getting negged for trying to make it more positive should have seen it coming
  20. 2 points
    Honestly a card like mystic tomato is exactly what this game needs
  21. 2 points
    i miss #yugioh-discussion pre-teams too
  22. 2 points
    New box contains; Vampire Lord Red-Eyes Zombie Dragon Gozuki Pahunder Pafather Buster Blader Dark Paladin lol Trade-In for Red-Eyes LOL Soul Ressurection (Call of the Haunted for Normal type monsters) Blazing Impachi 1850 ATK Normal Monster Knight of the Red Lotus which can Monster Reborn LV4 Normal Monsters... THIS PACK IS FUCKING NUTS LOL
  23. 2 points
    i did not think i'd get away with that bus, especially considering i'd be in a position to where i'd either flip my world to lynch francis, bus my partner, or just not post rest of day. fortunately for me francis was fooled by it and all things considered (my biggest threat imo), the rest of the town was as well. i was not purposefully trying to potato the game at all since i was in a good position but i didn't want to implicate myself to the jazz night kill (who i had killed because i thought they were indeed trying to draw a heal to themselves as a pr with the thought that mascis was doc). doc was able to self heal once but it is still a good nk on jazz in any case wild game!
  24. 2 points
    Note to myself: being drunk and scum is not working
  25. 2 points
    I have found that my team actually follows most of these rules which created the opposite effect where i wanted to play games for the war and contribute but we had too many active players. All in all though i do feel that this was a very positive experience and improved the activity on the site even if people did try to limit deck discussion to their own teams. I feel like an improvement would be to change the number of hearts based on the team size (of course maintaining a minimum number) of two teams warring, then angling has less of an effect if a larger portion of both teams are playing. As is, you can have 3 players play on a 10 person team and the other 7 don't get to contribute if you go 0-6.
  26. 2 points
    So many questions: 1. Mascis: why did you scan me? 2. ZP: why did you NK me? 3. Everyone: why did you town read ZP day 1? 4. Mascis: why did you fake a red on Tyranno? 5. Everyone: why did you consider lynching Mascis on day 2, when if another PR claims town has auto? Biggest mistake I saw: Town reading ZP for choosing to lynch Wunter instead of Francis. The vote count was like 2-2-1-1 wunter-francis-mascis-jazz. If ZP chooses not to vote he outs himself as scum. If ZP choose to lynch Francis, he outs himself AND wunter as scum. If ZP chooses to lynch wunter his team can still win. His only choice if he was scum was to lynch wunter. This does not make him scum 100% but it certainly does not make him town. Please consider things from other players perspectives in the future, and you will see that ZP's actions did not rule out the possibility that he was scum. :D
  27. 2 points
    Scum team wins. Aftergame thread is up:
  28. 2 points
  29. 2 points
    Yeah but again when you choose to do cross format, this is almost always going to happen to some extent. Its the tradeoff you make. If the priority was to ensure and encourage everyone to play above all else, endurance format guarantees that. The problem is that it will just take much longer. I mean we are blaming the above for dodging, but Markus implies that he felt like he was being targeted when two different members msgd him to war. I am not saying thats what happened but in general it does happen. The difference between targeting and dodging is that targeting is harder to prove. Further, we have a built in safeguard for dealing with it I believe where if you lose 2x, you're done. Maybe the thing to do is just to alter it to one and done. While that creates issues of resolving wars by activity issues, it takes care of the targeting and dodging problem for the most part as continued dodging would just result in that team losing the war by way of time. Idk I agree with ACP punishing them for intentionally trying to skirt the rules, but to me it isn't that big of a deal as it hard to regulate and will happen on some level regardless.
  30. 2 points
    Got a monthly (Exarion) Goat tournament started at my local shop (All the King's Men in Pitman NJ) and swept it with this Zoo list today: Monsters: 17 3 Berserk Gorilla 3 Exarion Universe 2 Abyss Soldier 1 Sinister Serpent 1 Breaker the Magical Warrior 1 Tribe-Infecting Virus 1 D.D. Assailant 1 Exiled Force 1 D.D. Warrior Lady 1 Blade Knight 1 Bazoo the Soul Eater 1 Sangan Spells: 9 2 Nobleman of Crossout 1 Pot of Greed 1 Premature Burial 1 Graceful Charity 1 Reinforcement of the Army 1 Mystical Space Typhoon 1 Delinquent Duo 1 Heavy Storm Traps: 14 3 Trap Dustshoot 2 Dust Tornado 2 Sakuretsu Armor 2 Compulsory Evacuation Device 1 Ring of Destruction 1 Mirror Force 1 Torrential Tribute 1 Call of the Haunted 1 Skill Drain Side: 2 Book of Moon 1 Sakuretsu Armor 2 Dekoichi the Battlechanted Locomotive 2 Kycoo the Ghost Destroyer 1 Mobius the Frost Monarch 1 Mystic Swordsman Lv2 2 Smashing Ground 3 Mind Crush 1 Dust Tornado Compulses were pretty sweet, an answer to TER that doubles as a monster in a pinch by protecting a dude from removal was pretty sweet. Blade Knight didn't come up too much, in the 4 rounds I played it killed a Jar, and poked for damage a few times. Not exciting, but did what I expected it to do. Only played against actual goat control twice, the other two rounds were a Zoo mirror, and Zombies, so the tech cards weren't at their best there. Compulses traded with Sakuretsus a lot. The other Zoo deck in the tournament was the guy I beat round 1, who won out to claim 2nd place. Turnout wasn't exciting, hoping to get a few more people for next month's event. Bunch of people cancelled last minute which was unfortunate.
  31. 2 points
    @ACP requesting site ban
  32. 1 point
    I'd love to start this game Friday morning. I'm going to implement a couple personal rules that I think will make the game more fun and inclusive. Format: - closed set-up - claiming is allowed - no copy+pasting of PMs - no character/flavor claiming - no duplicate roles - NK must be assigned to a player - mafia members will have safe claims - moderate number of roles (more vanilla than my other games) - no bastard mechanics (alignment conversions, flawed investigators, cults, lynch proof, etc.) - 17 players - 32/16 phases - 4 post quota New Features: - strictly no toxicity, no excessive insults (1st offense = warning, 2nd offense = modkill) - ties result in a random lynch between tied players - majority lynch is not in effect on day 1 Players: 1. Wunterslaus 2. Francis 3. Broken 4. crei 5. Winter 6. Nelrick 7. Sophocles 8. Malcolm 9. Zappdos 10. Silver 11. Tyranno 12. Kahu 13. 2k17 14. PSK 15. rei 16. Slick 17. Markus Subs: 1. Antag 2.
  33. 1 point
    I just have the people that can play on my team. rest of my team is not playing anymore only person that is not on that list is @N3sh
  34. 1 point
    Calm down, I gave him a warning. If it happens again just report his post again and we'll suspend him for a few days, according to the rules.
  35. 1 point
    The fake red check was a bad play but I think he panicked because he was one vote away from majority himself, for no good reason. He could have fessed up possibly. He was put in a bad situation by his fellow town though. Someone should have stated that we were in either Column C or Row 2, and that the cop/tracker must have claimed vanilla and softed a green-check. If I was in the game, I would have stated that. Town blew the "seer cover" by forcing everyone to come forward and demanding an unnecessary mass claim.
  36. 1 point
    I have seen so many things i disagree ill do the mature thing and just not acknowledge their existence That said, Jazz was indeed all over the place and it is why he didnt get town cred but underwood you played much worse. I had perfect info, that I checked 3 times to make sure you were town during day 2. I am not joking. Your reasoning was incredibly off to the point where I just couldnt accept you just had a bad game. Mascis didnt play exceptionally but you played extremely worse by advocating he dies if no other PR cc's, which makes 0 sense no matter how you look at it. You also failed to realize that he faked the red which was insanely obvious and decided to shrug it off as 'him being bad' when the situation had nothing to do with skill level whatsoever. Even the worst player in existence with a red on the 1 scum alive claims it in 0.2 seconds because the game is over. Also no, softing PR when you're not PR isnt something 'an experienced player shouldnt do'. It is a very valid play. If you suspect someone but dont kill him because 'oh noes he softed PR', the misplay is on you, not him. Same goes if you suspect him just cuz he softed PR when he wasnt.
  37. 1 point
    24h nights are best. The 2 games ive hosted/helped out almost all NKs/abilities were submitted last minute (both 24h nights) and in the Nazi game i was scum with 12h nights it was very frustrating because day ended at my 2 am so until I woke up we couldnt even discuss NK and that's 6 hours already out of the 12. Let alone if I dont wake up early then its night in US times so we have to wait even more. plus the 'break' a night provides is good so that you dont feel like you are playing all the time.
  38. 1 point
    I thought mascis was Tracker and Tyranno was doctor. When mascis told Tyranno that he healed him I thought that was a signal to Tyranno saying that Mascis knew Tyranno targeted him. Mascis also wanted to lynch Silver at start of day. If Tyranno or another VT had the balls to fake claim tracker and confirm that mascis visited Tyranno that would have been epic. You could have confirmed mascis and yourself as town and kept the set up concealed. I think.
  39. 1 point
    Mascis didn't play well but there was no reason to go so hard on him D2 and have everyone claim. There's one scum left, either he's lying about being a PR and you win by CC, or he's really a PR and you're only screwing him over by revealing the set-up. (In this case that he was actually cop)
  40. 1 point
    Nice just woke up
  41. 1 point
  42. 1 point
    Sounds like it's time to bring back Crossfire wars then? I mean this was always part of Hearts double elim but back in the day the best way to angle shoot was to not add shit players to your team if you cared about winning that much. Wars aren't learning through failure though, wars are where people actually care about the result and want to be regarded as #1 team on DGz to make your dick feel large.
  43. 1 point
  44. 1 point
    Idk if its impossible to regulate so much as we just need to set a tolerable amount. Idt anyone wants to play you or perovic in goats and will generally try to dodge you guys. I think that to an extent is tolerable so long as they are trying to play other people. Likewise, targeting weaker players would be tolerable in a system where it isn't going to fuck the team over. Going down 0-2 because you targeted someone that generally doesn't play current sucks for the that team. By reducing it to every player getting one heart, the targeting becomes more acceptable because it can't be abused. In response to the inactivity and wars not finishing concern, that resolves itself as far as I'm concerned. We aren't resolving wars through the active ppl as it is like you pointed out. If a team loses due to inactivity, they will respond by replacing those players. Further, this can be addressed by reducing the number of teams and increasing roster sizes to ensure a greater pool of active players. The one heart system addresses the dodging problem for the most part because it prevents abusive targeting which is why ppl dodge in the first place. While this can happen with bigger rosters, the increase in activity will result in wars finishing. There will always be weaker players and those players will always be targeted. The best we can do is prevent abusive targeting so that we reduce the incentive to dodge. At the end of the day, its a question of how much of this we will tolerate and I think that to a certain extent reducing the number of teams and changing it to a 1 player 1 heart format solves a lot of issues. And if you really want to ensure wars finish, all you have to do is implement a heart sub system where a fallen player can take the place of another one if they have been shown to be inactive. You can limit it to one time per war to make sure it isn't abused to dodge.
  45. 1 point
    yeah playing around saku to me sounds like ur gonna sit at a stale mate for 5 turns so you and your opponent can build enough card advantage to push (sounds awful)
  46. 1 point
    Team Beer has acquired @N3sh and paid 20 DRP.
  47. 1 point
    ^get out of the game thread while it's still going- as that can be viewed as relevant. thanks!
  48. 1 point
    Finished Uncharted 3 in preparation for 4 (I play all my games a year later after release minimum). Uncharted 3 on PS4... beautiful experience, but so flawed. I felt like I was playing an interactive film. The quicktime events were awful, the hand to hand combat was the worst I've experienced from a third person action game, the shooting was okay but the AI was thick as shit. But.. cinematically beautiful. Characters awesome for what they are, atmosphere great, story excellent for what it is, set pieces gold standard in video games, but SO much of it is out of my control. Rather than thinking "what shall I do", I'm thinking "what does the game designer want me to do next". No linearity in ANYTHING apart from a few optional stealth or go guns blazing. The worst thing about the franchise is the platforming. This is NOT a platformer.. its just a pseudo movie experience. A platformer is something like Mario with tight as fuck controls and a genuinely skill based and challenging system of learning. You really realise how good a video game is when it can live and die by its gameplay. Mario does it with platforming, Dark souls does it with combat. For all the cinematic draw it does hold, The Last of Us trounces it in every department which makes me feel like.. .is this really worth it. Enjoyed the experience but Tomb Raider (2013) >>>>>>>>>>> Uncharted 3 in every way. The inorganic set pieces which Naughty Dog put into place are too much for me. Next game I've picked up is Witcher 1. Instantly drawn into the lore of the story, characterisation seems really solid, combat is shit but addictive, the depth of the combat system though is quite phenomenal. For the first time in a video game, I'm reading the books I can purchase in game for hints and tips on how to deal with certain monsters. Its just a step up from uncharted 3 in so many ways yet so backwards in a presentation perspective. Once I've finished this I'm going to play: Red Dead Redemption Mass Effect 2 Cold Steel 2 Witcher 2 Dark Souls 2
  49. 1 point
    Checking in for the old man penis competition
  50. 1 point
    I made to KOG with Three-Star Demotion DM in Platinum I originally used Pure Harpies or Relinquished Harpies Ladies. Credit to Digdick for the original deck the only difference is I used a 3rd Blue Dragon Summoner and he used a Magic Drain. So don't know if on June 9th I will take this deck, Pure Harpies Ladies, or Relinquished Harpies Ladies (With a few changes).
×