Fuh Kit

Duelist
  • Content count

    928
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

174 Solid

7 Followers

About Fuh Kit

  • Rank
    Guardian
  • Birthday December 5

Contact Methods

  • AIM JustThatOtherJew
  • Website URL http://
  • ICQ 0

Profile Information

  • Gender Male
  • Location SoCal
  1. Honestly, I have no idea who you are, but I dislike you from your responses in the thread alone. Like others have said in this thread, most "consistent" players cheat in some way. I live in California, and a good majority of the people I know who have done well in events have cheated at some points, its a very common thing. For someone such as yourself, who seems to have quite a few credentials, I wouldn't put it past you.  Angel shouldn't have pointed it out to you in this thread, maybe by messaging. I agree. BUT, you had no reason to put him on blast and tell him he sucked, he was simply retaliating with a potentially valid point. You're so butthurt about it, it hasn't even been the topic for like 2 pages, just give up.
  2. So, I've been gone for the greater part of who knows how long, but I came here to say something.   Angel won, he deserved it. I've known him for like 6+ years potentially, and while he (and i, and everyone else we fucking knew) were awful at a certain point, he's come a long way and done well in the recent years. That being said, he potentially did come off as an asshole in this thread, and he got negged for it. The problem I see is Steinman was EQUALLY AS RUDE, but he got praised instead. Steinman was also not provoked initially, while Angel obviously was considering all the fat talk and whatever else, I'm not too sure, i just read the past few pages. What does being fat have to do with being good at yugioh? Nothing.   You all either defending Mike Steinman blindly (in regards to whether or not he cheated, considering the fact that you weren't there and probably don't know him on a personal level), while completely attacking Angel, OR you stayed somewhat neutral saying "just get over this" and such. I'm here to do the opposite, to defend Angel. If he and Ryan say that Steinman cheated in top 4, I'm sure as hell gonna fucking believe them. They would have literally no reason to come up with that to tell me while steinman was in top 4, before Angel was even playing against him. He was well deserving of a win, even if he may have played somewhat poorly (as far as i hear) in the finals. There was like 19 other rounds or something, no? Everyone makes mistakes, surely Steinman misplayed earlier in the tournament and still got as far as he did, but no one is giving him shit about that. If angel had lost in the finals, even if he played better than his opponent, I would have simply thought "that sucks", in no way would i try to say "STEINMAN DIDN'T DESERVE IT". People get what they truly deserve eventually, and if you guys believe so much in Steinman's skill, he will one day too eventually win a ycs. for now, let angel have his moment.
  3. Ive never played a hack before, but I played that ruby legends of guardian thing these past few days, and it was pretty fun. Are there any other games that are like completely different regions with a few fake pokemon?
  4. I lol'd when i read that the guy said this deck is horrible.
  5. [quote name='cetuskun' timestamp='1337634740' post='3187201'] My friend was one of the 9-2s that barely missed topping. He finished 38th with Inzektors. Btw he was the person who started the Kaboozels thing lol. He started doing it because it drove one of our friends crazy and our friend started calling it Kaboozels when he went to events. It seems like its spread pretty far. I heard someone I didn't know say Kaboozels at the YCS and I saw a video from YCS Chicago where someone also called it Kaboozels. [/quote] I definitely don't think he's the only one that started it, I heard it from a range of people. SoCal was calling it Kaboozles when I was playing Darkworld around December, lol. When we were at Long Beach we were surprised others were saying it too.
  6. Can someone please explain to me why safe zone is good in this deck? I can obviously see its usefulness in Inzektors, but theres not the same synergy going on here. You're effectively making your dolkka not nearly as good after the protection, it's not like you need to be dodging veilers and shit.
  7. [quote name='dennis frogman' timestamp='1335766188' post='3168590'] [quote name='Urthor' timestamp='1335764471' post='3168578'] Not that it matters he probably didn't stack, but did you take the time to pile shuffle him? [/quote] i ACTUALLY DID and get this GAME 1 he presents me 42 cards (i pile and count because i had just talked to sam pedigo and he mentioned how he was really suspicious that his last opponent had pulled some shit like this) and then game 2 i pile and count 41 and im like judge and then he counts out his side which was 15. so this fucking kid presided against me and since i didnt count his side before g1 there was nothing i could do [/quote] When you pile your opponents deck, regardless of game, you should verify "You play 42?" after you pile shuffle. This way they don't try to cheat you game 2, cuz they realize that you're on their shit.
  8. [quote name='Fuh Kit' timestamp='1335748448' post='3168225'] [quote name='Dr. Doom - Diabolic Genius' timestamp='1335744959' post='3168144'] I don't mind you putting the list on youtube, just give me credit plox. And thanks Grimey! [/quote] Yeah, I was gonna write your name in. It'll be up in an hour, I'll link it to here when it's up. [/quote] [media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StNVAp6dfxM&list=UUv2p_9a76lOo_RXepbXdYCA[/media]
  9. [quote name='Dr. Doom - Diabolic Genius' timestamp='1335744959' post='3168144'] I don't mind you putting the list on youtube, just give me credit plox. And thanks Grimey! [/quote] Yeah, I was gonna write your name in. It'll be up in an hour, I'll link it to here when it's up.
  10. [quote name='Dr. Doom - Diabolic Genius' timestamp='1335742211' post='3168099'] This was my decklist in its entirety, I'll write a report later but I know the decklists won't be up forever. 3 Kabazauls 3 Sabersaurus 3 Rescue Rabbit 3 Tour Guide from the Underworld 3 Effect Veiler 1 Gorz the Emissary of Darkness 1 Sangan 1 Snowman Eater 3 Forbidden Lance 3 Mystical Space Typhoon 1 Dark Hole 1 Monster Reborn 1 Pot of Avarice 1 Book of Moon 1 Heavy Storm 1 Smashing Ground 2 Fiendish Chain 2 Solemn Warning 2 Bottomless Trap Hole 2 Torrential Tribute 1 Solemn Judgment Main: 21:12:9:42 Sideboard: 3 Macro Cosmos 2 Arcana Force 0 - The Fool 2 Maxx "C" 2 Chain Disappearance 2 Dimensional Prison 1 Mind Control 1 Smashing Ground 1 Snowman Eater 1 Electric Virus 2 Evolzar Laggia 2 Evolzar Dolkka 2 Leviair the Sea Dragon 2 Number 39: Utopia 1 Number C39: Utopia Ray 1 Maestroke the Symphony Djinn 1 Steelswarm Roach 1 Temtempo the Percussion Djinn 1 Wind-Up Zenmaines 1 Number 17: Leviathan Dragon 1 Number 30: Acid Golem of Destruction [/quote] Were you playing 3 Guaibas? 3 monsters are missing
  11. [quote name='Jeff Jones' timestamp='1335301726' post='3163439'] [quote name='Exhale' timestamp='1335301387' post='3163433'] [quote name='Jeff Jones' timestamp='1335301074' post='3163428'] [quote name='Exhale' timestamp='1335300673' post='3163421'] [quote name='Jeff Jones' timestamp='1335300540' post='3163418'] [quote name='Exhale' timestamp='1335297939' post='3163388'] [quote name='benthegreat' timestamp='1335294222' post='3163351'] [quote name='Jeff Jones' timestamp='1335293074' post='3163337'] [quote name='Tranqulity.' timestamp='1335292879' post='3163336'] Skill drain is a problem for this deck? [/quote] No lyla no ryko means no milling outside of Recharge and Trooper. No Chaos Sorcerer, no REDM effect, no TGU. Your basically going to be playing "big normal monster deck" lol [/quote] And add that something like Grapha or Barbaros backed by skill drain is almost impossible for the dragon deck to otherwise get over unless you luck into BLS. [/quote] how is it "almost impossible to get over"? Grapha alone is quite easy to get over for the deck, they aren't stopping you from milling, and they aren't stopping you from getting your effects, if they have a Skill Drain out, you can easily get a REDMD out, or use 1 of your 4 S/T removals on the Skill Drain and make plays. Barbaros and Skill Drain could be a little more difficult, but I mean you act like it's hard to conserve cards that are good for a matchup. Like if I see I'm playing vs Heros turn 1 when they Stratos, I'm not going to go turn 1 Typhoon your 1 backrow summon Trooper attack Stratos, you know? You conserve cards that are good for the matchup, Typhoon, Storm, Dark Hole, etc. Conserve your outs. The problem with all this theory is that people just go "oh well if they get out this setup, you lose". It doesn't work that way. A good player will have 6+ turns to have the out, so I'll theoretically be able to get through at least 12 cards in my deck (AT LEAST) to get the out to the situation. If the troublesome scenario of Barbaros + Skill Drain arises, it really isn' too hard to have conserved 1 or 2 of your good outs to the scenario and use them when needed. As I said in my profile, I never set MST, and I never used it early. I conserved it for the wholeeeeeee game until I really needed it. There were times even where I went Lightpulsar into 3 backrows, or Darkflare into 2 or whatever and I would conserve my Typhoons. The idea is to save those power cards until you know it's game. [/quote] 1) You do realize that more often then not, Grapha is 3000 no? 2) if your forced to use S/T removal on Skill Drain, that means that the field spell stays there. So you better be making it count, and have some sort of way to make it so they cant come back. [/quote] if you get rid of the Drain with a S/T, it's not too hard to have the Lyla/Ryko on the field spell though [/quote] So that means you had MST set with Ryko set, and you said you NEVER set MST Unless you were bad and set a lone ryko and hoped they didnt attack it CONTRADICTION!? [/quote] game 2 i set MST obviously because they side out their's, but yeah game 1 it would depend on the scenario, setting 2-3 S/T (one being MST), and Ryko doesn't seem bad at all in certain scenarios [/quote] I'd just like to point out our most recent 2 time YCS Champion keeps in veiler/maxx c in the mirror match and trap holes Tour Guides. Even though the seemingly right thing to do is side out MST, NO ONE DOES IT. THEY ARE FUCKING RETARDED AND IT WILL BACKFIRE ON YOU Me, Alistar, Billy all agree to this. [/quote] This this this Robbie wanted to side Shard of Greed and Prohibition at our regional, I told him people always keep MST in anyways.
  12. I ran this at a regionals: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twips9uw8Ho&list=UUv2p_9a76lOo_RXepbXdYCA&index=1&feature=plcp Sorry about the lighting :\
  13. I disagree with trying to play 2 over 1, yes it is an early game card, but it also just very good in most matchups. Yes, it's normally fine vs rabbit, but if they know what youre playing against they like always make dolkka in fear of gorz/trag. He loses completely to inzektors, and thats the matchup you need to fix when playing this deck. I played 4 Inzektors at the regional, and I feel like if you have a brain you should be able to beat this deck with that deck. Those of you who are saying you play it but dont have tour guides, it really doesnt matter, because you're basically playing a completely different deck. No tour guides closes up so many option, including not having darks.
  14. I went 7-2 at a California regionals, and I honestly don't feel as though one of my losses was very legitimate, but not much could be done. I played 3 Lyla/2 Ryko/2 Recharge, 1 Trag that I hated, 2 Sorc/1 Darkflare, might go to 2 DF. I also played Honest. 2 Wyvern, 2 Veiler. Gonna play the 3rd Veiler. You also should be siding a good out to dolkka, eg: smashing.
  15. [quote name='Sand' timestamp='1334553947' post='3156318'] [quote name='Fuh Kit' timestamp='1334550830' post='3156279'] [quote name='Sand' timestamp='1334550026' post='3156269'] [quote name='Egnever' timestamp='1334549047' post='3156259'] [quote name='dennis frogman' timestamp='1334543146' post='3156177'] edit: then again i could be full of shit because nizar apparently trap hole'd alistar's tour guide and kept c's in against inzektors. idk. [/quote] I'm guessing he conveniently didn't draw the C's against Inzektors? [/quote] I got the impression that Maxx "C" was good vs Sword/Hopper variants of Inzektors to help prevent the opponent from OTKing you. Is that not true? (Not trying to defend Nizar, because I know via experience that he's a filthy soft-cheating piece of shit, but just confused). [/quote] Maxx "C" is iffy somewhat against that variant, and most of the time (in my opinion) I'd still rather take it out, as it's only really good when they have Dragonfly + Hornet + Sword/Giga, and I am putting in macro, so I don't really want them to conflict as much. Inzektors often just try to play with centipede or dragonfly games, maxx c doesn't do anything for centipede, and is a shitty upstart vs dragonfly. They also don't have tour guide in that variant most of the time, so it isn't as good at stopping those plays. [/quote] [quote name='guylaroche5' timestamp='1334551672' post='3156289'] [quote name='Sand' timestamp='1334550026' post='3156269'] [quote name='Egnever' timestamp='1334549047' post='3156259'] [quote name='dennis frogman' timestamp='1334543146' post='3156177'] edit: then again i could be full of shit because nizar apparently trap hole'd alistar's tour guide and kept c's in against inzektors. idk. [/quote] I'm guessing he conveniently didn't draw the C's against Inzektors? [/quote] I got the impression that Maxx "C" was good vs Sword/Hopper variants of Inzektors to help prevent the opponent from OTKing you. Is that not true? (Not trying to defend Nizar, because I know via experience that he's a filthy soft-cheating piece of shit, but just confused). [/quote] you have to take it into the context of the build alistar was using. now i have no idea what he revealed game 1 but i'm pretty sure he said he was using the 'floater' version of inzektors with maxed out coth's, troopers and shit. again though, maxx "c" isn't that bad as you trade off with coth/dragonfly plays so its not the WORST thing in the world [/quote] I'm not saying that Maxx "C" should or shouldn't be put in, as it depends on multiple factors as mentioned. But some people were just posting in disgust at the idea of people keeping Maxx "C" in against Inzektors, and it just seemed pretty ignorant. [quote name='dennis frogman' timestamp='1334553268' post='3156310'] Nizar might also have just not had enough sidedeck stuff for inzektors to replace the Cs and Reapers, idk. I do remember he p much blatantly tried to cheat Evan at nats, tho. That wasn't cool [/quote] Yes, definitely not cool at all. It's okay, though, I still raped him. [/quote] I agree with you, there is merit in keeping in Maxx "C" against inzektors, but I do think that the only time I'd keep it in is if I saw a high combination of Guides/Zekts/Calls during game 1.